Skip to main content

In pairs and half a pear


Här är två kameror - mina favoriter.
Below are two cameras - nearly identical. Seemingly so.



Canonet 28 till vänster väger kanske 200 gram mindre än sitt syskon Canonet 19. Den mesta vikten består av större och fler linser i objektivet. Metallen i 19 är också tjockare och den har färre plastdetaljer.

The left one - the Canonet 28 - weighs perhaps 200 g less than the one to the right - the Canonet 19. It's all in the lens - lots of glass - and the casing. There is thicker metal in the 19 and more plastic parts on the 28.


Ricoh-kamerorna här ovan representerar också ett kvalitetsskutt. 500 ST är lätt, ganska plastig i känslan, och har halvautomatisk exponering. 500 G är tyngre, har finare lins och detaljer samt är helt manuell om man vill.

The Ricohs above are also different animals, despite a visual likeness. Weight, lens quality and quality as opposed to budget detailing are evident when you take a closer look.

---

Nästa bild är tagen genom sökaren på en Chinonflex TTL sedan jag skruvat på en makrolins bakom kamerans 55 mm standardlins. Ganska så fantastiskt kort skärpedjup!
The next image is taken through a SLR with a macro lens added to the original 55 mm lens. Pretty amazing depth of field!


Det här såg vi vid lekplatsen där vi hängde en stund när vi var i Götet i helgen. Gött päron antagligen.
This is what my daughter and I saw close to the playground that we frequented during our stay in Gothenburg last weekend. Probably a juicy pear.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lomo-Modd-Orama

A Lomo Smena 8 camera with a faulty shutter. An Olympus Pen F camera. Part of a microscope adapter for the Pen. That's what I started out with. 45 minutes later I had a new lens!

Mount
The mount came off a microscope adapter. I got the adapter from my first (of two) attempts to buy an Olympus Pen F. There seem to be some unscrupolous ebay sellers around peddling useless Pens with microscope adapted prisms. Luckily - in hindsight - I got a microscope adapter with this first Pen. Which I now trashed when a Lomo Smena 8 without a future landed on my doorstep (figuratively speaking).



Conversion / Havoc

Smena
I only knew the camera as a half-frame camera [Correction - it's a full frame camera!] called Smena 8 and hadn't thought to place it in Lomography-land until I read the name Lomo on the lens when it was already modded. Unwittingly I had tread the tiles of lomo-dom twice in as many weeks, also having put two rolls through a Praktica CX-1 which appears to be Ground Zero of Lo…

Chaika Leica

Well, here's a Chaika 2M that I bought from Alex Helios via Instagram. 

It's a great full manual viewfinder half-frame camera. The wheel on the top is for shutter time selection, from B to 1/30th to 1/250th of a second. The square button on the front right of the camera is the release/exposure.

The lens mounted on the camera in the picture is not the original Industar-69. The Chaika is a rare model compact camera since the prime lens is detachable. What is more is that it has M39 screw mount. But - like with the Paxette M39 system - you can't get focus with a lens from another M39 system.

Unless you adapt the lens or - in this case - the camera (mount)!





The Chaika mount is easily detached from the body by loosening four screws. If I want to mount the Leica thread mount M39 (LTM) lenses on the Chaika - which is my goal with this mod - I have to add 1.3mm to the mount. That is what is needed to change the camera's flange focal distance (FFD) from Chaika system to LTM sys…

Pax Expansivos - Expanding the Use of a Paxette Kit

That which you see before your eyes are hybrids. They are the concoction of a twisted mind. (Mine.)
  The idea sprung to mind while researching the Paxette camera. I learned that it had exchangeable lenses with M39 screw mount - not compatible with Leica thread mount (LTM) system M39 lenses, though. The reason they weren't compatible systems? FFD difference. I.e. Flange Focal Distances differed.

The Paxette body project
But! I have another lens with M39 mount that's not compatible with LTM cameras, I pondered. The Mir-1 which came with the early Zenit SLRs. I had to use an adapter ring to make it fit my M42 screw mount cameras. What if...
  So I fit it to the Paxette body. The exact same screw threads. Then I read up on FFD. The difference between the Paxette system and the M42 SLR system is 1.46mm apparently. That explains why I hadn't come across anyone online who claimed to use Paxette lenses on an SLR. It would be out of focus.
  On the other hand... Why don…