Skip to main content

Obsoletely Fabulous

Foth Derby 1930s camera
The 127-film format is one of many that cropped up during the last century, and all but disappeared after some time. Nowadays the big stars are 135-film and 120-film (220 also, which is twice as much film on a 120 roll).
  I've mentioned the 620-film format in my post about the Kodak Duoflex TLR, which is the same size negative as 120-film only on a different (and uncompatible) spool.
  Some great cameras were made for the 127-films. The image size is most commonly 40x40 mm which is 12 images on a roll. The second most common seems to be 40x25 mm which produces 16. A rare one is the 40x65 mm.
  I got me a Foth Derby 127 camera a while back. It didn't work. They rarely do, I came to realize after some research. That's not strange, really, since they were manufactured before the war, and sported cloth shutters similar to your Canon SLR:s and rangefinders of the 50s and up to the eighties. Glue and cloth ages a tad in 70-odd years. The Derbys with working shutters go for big bucks. Mine did come to some use since I modded the lens to use on my M42 mount SLR:s which I've written about in the past.
Next came the Italian Bencini Comet III. It looks very much like a film camera. Its entire design idea is 'film camera'. But it loads a 127-film and makes 40x25 mm pictures.
There is a fixed aperture of 11, if I remember correctly, and shutter speed is 1/60th or B(ulb) mode. Not much of a choice. Though you get to set the focus which is a good thing.
  The finder is very small but I got used to it after a while.
The next 127-camera is a tiny french one called Belco. Very primitive - i.e. a proper point-and-shoot from the early 1950s.
I've placed it next to a normal size matchbox - it's so tiny.
  I haven't yet developed the first roll to see what the 45 mm lens could accomplish.
Last - but not least - is the Yashica 44. It's one of the few TLR:s made for the 127 film. Another is a Rolleiflex model. There is also a much appreciated but problem prone reflex camera (similar to Hasselblad etc) which is called Komaflex that uses 127 film.
  As you can see - unlike the other cameras I've tested (not counting the Derby) - it has full manual control of exposure just like any other TLR of quality. The 44 in the name is of course an allusion to the 4x4 cm image format.
  Since the film is smaller size than 120 film the camera body is also smaller than other TLR:s.
  I haven't yet developed the two films I've exposed on this one.

Speaking about the film type the availability nowadays is scarce. There is a japanese brand which sells black & white 100 and 400 ASA film and there is also a company in the UK which cuts and respools 400 ASA black & white Ilford film onto 127 film spools. I haven't seen any colour films. I've bought rolls ranging from €10-20.

[Update August 2019. I have bought a colour positive film (actually dual C-41/E-6 process) from MacroDirect. There is also Rera Chrome colour film available. So far Lomography haven't issued any 127 film.]

You can buy the Belco and the Bencini from my Etsy shop getOurBooks!
Find my photos at Instagram @flashknappen
and my illustration work @getourart

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lomo-Modd-Orama

A Lomo Smena 8 camera with a faulty shutter. An Olympus Pen F camera. Part of a microscope adapter for the Pen. That's what I started out with. 45 minutes later I had a new lens!

Mount
The mount came off a microscope adapter. I got the adapter from my first (of two) attempts to buy an Olympus Pen F. There seem to be some unscrupolous ebay sellers around peddling useless Pens with microscope adapted prisms. Luckily - in hindsight - I got a microscope adapter with this first Pen. Which I now trashed when a Lomo Smena 8 without a future landed on my doorstep (figuratively speaking).



Conversion / Havoc

Smena
I only knew the camera as a half-frame camera [Correction - it's a full frame camera!] called Smena 8 and hadn't thought to place it in Lomography-land until I read the name Lomo on the lens when it was already modded. Unwittingly I had tread the tiles of lomo-dom twice in as many weeks, also having put two rolls through a Praktica CX-1 which appears to be Ground Zero of Lo…

Chaika Leica

Well, here's a Chaika 2M that I bought from Alex Helios via Instagram. 

It's a great full manual viewfinder half-frame camera. The wheel on the top is for shutter time selection, from B to 1/30th to 1/250th of a second. The square button on the front right of the camera is the release/exposure.

The lens mounted on the camera in the picture is not the original Industar-69. The Chaika is a rare model compact camera since the prime lens is detachable. What is more is that it has M39 screw mount. But - like with the Paxette M39 system - you can't get focus with a lens from another M39 system.

Unless you adapt the lens or - in this case - the camera (mount)!





The Chaika mount is easily detached from the body by loosening four screws. If I want to mount the Leica thread mount M39 (LTM) lenses on the Chaika - which is my goal with this mod - I have to add 1.3mm to the mount. That is what is needed to change the camera's flange focal distance (FFD) from Chaika system to LTM sys…

Pax Expansivos - Expanding the Use of a Paxette Kit

That which you see before your eyes are hybrids. They are the concoction of a twisted mind. (Mine.)
  The idea sprung to mind while researching the Paxette camera. I learned that it had exchangeable lenses with M39 screw mount - not compatible with Leica thread mount (LTM) system M39 lenses, though. The reason they weren't compatible systems? FFD difference. I.e. Flange Focal Distances differed.

The Paxette body project
But! I have another lens with M39 mount that's not compatible with LTM cameras, I pondered. The Mir-1 which came with the early Zenit SLRs. I had to use an adapter ring to make it fit my M42 screw mount cameras. What if...
  So I fit it to the Paxette body. The exact same screw threads. Then I read up on FFD. The difference between the Paxette system and the M42 SLR system is 1.46mm apparently. That explains why I hadn't come across anyone online who claimed to use Paxette lenses on an SLR. It would be out of focus.
  On the other hand... Why don…