Skip to main content

Metering Range

I want to write a little something about this kit which I will use a bit during the summer. There is an older post about the most recent roll I developed from the camera here.
  The most important thing in the picture above is to the top right: The light meter! This one's a Unittic - I'd never heard about the brand before. It works - that's the whole point. A used light meter is easy to find at a very decent price. Mine was €20 including shipping from the Swedish auction giant. There is an abundance of light meter apps as well. I prefer to keep a real one in my back pocket, though. Most light meters produced 1950 to 1975 were selenium cell based, I gather. That means no need for a battery. It also means that when you've found one it may not work properly even though the metering needle moves, so one needs to check it for accuracy before use, which is an easy task.
  I keep my light meter with me so can use a camera of choice depending on the purpose of the day's photography. I happen to keep a good 5-6 cameras loaded with film in the bright season so can bring any one of them along and get good exposures for sure.
  Mostly I measure for skin tone minus one step. So if skin tone is 1/125th at 1:5,6 (with 400 ASA film) I expose at 1:8. I just point the light meter to my hand which I hold in the preferred light.
  The next thing in the picture I want to mention (in no particular order henceforth) is the case with the snap button. It is the perfect size for keeping the light meter and/or some rolls of film. I just hate it when I have to dig around blindly at the bottom of my bag to find my film. It's much better to keep the small items collected in one place.
  I just love the old metal canisters for film rolls with the brands printed on them. This one doesn't actually contain an Ilford film but a Rollei 400S, which I've bulk loaded.
  The metal lens hood is an important accessory. In my case since I use a lot of older cameras and lenses which have foggy or scratched glass because of old age and extensive usage. When light hits a fogged lens (or one with an abundance of micro-scratches from cleaning and usage) the image that is projected onto the film will be soft in contrasts or have halos around highlights. Eveb reflected strong light also has this effect on some lenses. Therefore a lens hood is indispensible - or cloudy weather!
  My lens hood was initially used on a TLR camera but fit snugly to this lens. It's not screwed on but is held in place by metal clips.
The camera with the crappy lens [sic!] is a Halina 35X. You can see some pictures from last summer here. It's the most basic camera. When you've wound the film you even have to cock the shutter. The photos it produces have a true retro look due in part to the lens' uneven focus (middle) and light vignetting (corners). I think it's perfect! For me the pictures convey a timelessness and sometimes a dreamlike quality. (I have ordered this Lomography Metropolis film which will be perfect for this camera.)
The thing on top of the camera is a rangefinder. Since the camera hasn't got one inside to keep track of the focus one can add a rangefinder. You find focus in it then transfer the information to the focus ring on the camera. Easy peasy. Rangefinders can be bought for €10 and up on auction sites. There were a lot of them produced by known and unknown (cheaper but equally good!) brands.

Here's my Instagrams: #flashknappen #ourbooksmalmo #getourart
and the Etsy shop.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lomo-Modd-Orama

A Lomo Smena 8 camera with a faulty shutter. An Olympus Pen F camera. Part of a microscope adapter for the Pen. That's what I started out with. 45 minutes later I had a new lens!

Mount
The mount came off a microscope adapter. I got the adapter from my first (of two) attempts to buy an Olympus Pen F. There seem to be some unscrupolous ebay sellers around peddling useless Pens with microscope adapted prisms. Luckily - in hindsight - I got a microscope adapter with this first Pen. Which I now trashed when a Lomo Smena 8 without a future landed on my doorstep (figuratively speaking).



Conversion / Havoc

Smena
I only knew the camera as a half-frame camera [Correction - it's a full frame camera!] called Smena 8 and hadn't thought to place it in Lomography-land until I read the name Lomo on the lens when it was already modded. Unwittingly I had tread the tiles of lomo-dom twice in as many weeks, also having put two rolls through a Praktica CX-1 which appears to be Ground Zero of Lo…

Chaika Leica

Well, here's a Chaika 2M that I bought from Alex Helios via Instagram. 

It's a great full manual viewfinder half-frame camera. The wheel on the top is for shutter time selection, from B to 1/30th to 1/250th of a second. The square button on the front right of the camera is the release/exposure.

The lens mounted on the camera in the picture is not the original Industar-69. The Chaika is a rare model compact camera since the prime lens is detachable. What is more is that it has M39 screw mount. But - like with the Paxette M39 system - you can't get focus with a lens from another M39 system.

Unless you adapt the lens or - in this case - the camera (mount)!





The Chaika mount is easily detached from the body by loosening four screws. If I want to mount the Leica thread mount M39 (LTM) lenses on the Chaika - which is my goal with this mod - I have to add 1.3mm to the mount. That is what is needed to change the camera's flange focal distance (FFD) from Chaika system to LTM sys…

Pax Expansivos - Expanding the Use of a Paxette Kit

That which you see before your eyes are hybrids. They are the concoction of a twisted mind. (Mine.)
  The idea sprung to mind while researching the Paxette camera. I learned that it had exchangeable lenses with M39 screw mount - not compatible with Leica thread mount (LTM) system M39 lenses, though. The reason they weren't compatible systems? FFD difference. I.e. Flange Focal Distances differed.

The Paxette body project
But! I have another lens with M39 mount that's not compatible with LTM cameras, I pondered. The Mir-1 which came with the early Zenit SLRs. I had to use an adapter ring to make it fit my M42 screw mount cameras. What if...
  So I fit it to the Paxette body. The exact same screw threads. Then I read up on FFD. The difference between the Paxette system and the M42 SLR system is 1.46mm apparently. That explains why I hadn't come across anyone online who claimed to use Paxette lenses on an SLR. It would be out of focus.
  On the other hand... Why don…