Skip to main content

Photograph to Live to Photograph

I thought I'd write something about how I photograph. Or more correctly: How I have photographed. I do believe that you evolve your style of photography all the time, since you learn to master technique or technology more and more. It's all off course depending on what your aims are and what limitations you are stuck with or set for yourself.
I did for years use 'focus free' disposable or very basic cameras. My photography was (and still is, to a degree) used by myself to document my life as I lived it. Perhaps the way to describe it.
As I lived my life the photographs - which always appeared after some time, after developing - heightened my experiences.
After a long time (I lived for more than ten years with the plastics) I aquired a point-and-shoot digital camera. That slowly brought me back to the 'scientific' side of photography like aperture settings and ASA/ISO.
Suddenly I could expose for the highlights. When sending the film away for developing and copies the lab (automation) would decide how a photo would appear. So I'd learned to decide which kind of photo I wanted when taking the picture. I'd use highlights to push contrast since I knew the lab would expose the copy for the highlights, etc.
With the Canon S90 I was suddenly in control and could expose how I wanted - in this case lighten the shadows.
The disposables were not good for close-focus. Less than a meter would make blurred foreground. That could be used by the photographer as a tool. In this case I took a series of similar photos of found objects which made the focus less of a matter.
This is my hand after sanding white planks.
The single use cameras would have 28 or 35 mm lenses so with the added limitation of no focus closer than 1,5 meters or so images of close details were out of the question. It however could be used to add context or framing around the object of interest.
Thank the lab for this automated exposure of this copy.
Flash is not my favourite accessory but in some situations the disposable's built-in flash come handy.
Again, automated copying made my efforts come out as planned.
Full body portrait from a bit above.
 This is an early photograph made with my €1 Olympus XA. It's a 35 mm. Small as a disposable camera, which made me pick it up in the first place.
Low-light fun with the XA.
More low-light fun with the XA.
This is a good example of how you can use the disposable's limitations to your advantage in composition.
As is this one.
Just get really low and potentially dull compositions get more interesting.
Another XA composition, combined with the knowledge of the lab's automation.
Another disposable in action. Also - composition-wise - take a step to the right to add context to your portrait.
More search for the unexpected. This time with the S90.
Once again - using the control over exposure settings to make a more interesting portrait.
The close-focus capabilities was a huge selling-point for me to buy the S90.
Composing with patterns, shapes and colours, as well as with in- and out-of-focus areas.
Just stop for a second and wait for your friend (doing the heavy lifting) to come into the natural frame of the door.
Use the space between the foreground and background to indicate a sense of relief and freedom.
Slow down a bit to allow your friends to be framed by the shadowy area.

I hope this post about some strands of theory and practice has inspired you. Don't hesitate to comment or contact me.

Thanks for reading this post! Don't hesitate to comment or check out my Instagram at #ourbooksmalmo. Visit my Etsy shop getOurBooks where there are cameras aplenty to choose from.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lomo-Modd-Orama

A Lomo Smena 8 camera with a faulty shutter. An Olympus Pen F camera. Part of a microscope adapter for the Pen. That's what I started out with. 45 minutes later I had a new lens!

Mount
The mount came off a microscope adapter. I got the adapter from my first (of two) attempts to buy an Olympus Pen F. There seem to be some unscrupolous ebay sellers around peddling useless Pens with microscope adapted prisms. Luckily - in hindsight - I got a microscope adapter with this first Pen. Which I now trashed when a Lomo Smena 8 without a future landed on my doorstep (figuratively speaking).



Conversion / Havoc

Smena
I only knew the camera as a half-frame camera [Correction - it's a full frame camera!] called Smena 8 and hadn't thought to place it in Lomography-land until I read the name Lomo on the lens when it was already modded. Unwittingly I had tread the tiles of lomo-dom twice in as many weeks, also having put two rolls through a Praktica CX-1 which appears to be Ground Zero of Lo…

Chaika Leica

Well, here's a Chaika 2M that I bought from Alex Helios via Instagram. 

It's a great full manual viewfinder half-frame camera. The wheel on the top is for shutter time selection, from B to 1/30th to 1/250th of a second. The square button on the front right of the camera is the release/exposure.

The lens mounted on the camera in the picture is not the original Industar-69. The Chaika is a rare model compact camera since the prime lens is detachable. What is more is that it has M39 screw mount. But - like with the Paxette M39 system - you can't get focus with a lens from another M39 system.

Unless you adapt the lens or - in this case - the camera (mount)!





The Chaika mount is easily detached from the body by loosening four screws. If I want to mount the Leica thread mount M39 (LTM) lenses on the Chaika - which is my goal with this mod - I have to add 1.3mm to the mount. That is what is needed to change the camera's flange focal distance (FFD) from Chaika system to LTM sys…

Pax Expansivos - Expanding the Use of a Paxette Kit

That which you see before your eyes are hybrids. They are the concoction of a twisted mind. (Mine.)
  The idea sprung to mind while researching the Paxette camera. I learned that it had exchangeable lenses with M39 screw mount - not compatible with Leica thread mount (LTM) system M39 lenses, though. The reason they weren't compatible systems? FFD difference. I.e. Flange Focal Distances differed.

The Paxette body project
But! I have another lens with M39 mount that's not compatible with LTM cameras, I pondered. The Mir-1 which came with the early Zenit SLRs. I had to use an adapter ring to make it fit my M42 screw mount cameras. What if...
  So I fit it to the Paxette body. The exact same screw threads. Then I read up on FFD. The difference between the Paxette system and the M42 SLR system is 1.46mm apparently. That explains why I hadn't come across anyone online who claimed to use Paxette lenses on an SLR. It would be out of focus.
  On the other hand... Why don…