Skip to main content

A Chaika on a Hike - LomoChrome Metropolis in Soggy Winter



This is my first roll of Lomography Lomochrome Metropolis @400 ASA. I received it in the middle of the very uninspiring winter. To tell the truth it took some real effort to finish the 72 exposures under those conditions.


The first camera I decided to try it in is my modded Chaika 2M which now carries any Leica thread mount (LTM) lens with a flair. My thought process was that the strong characteristics of the camera would be the perfect fit for the film's very own distinct characteristics.


Being a half-frame camera the camera/photos don't do entire justice to the fine LTM lenses in not showing the full image. I've mostly used two wide angle 35 mm lenses making the photo crop equivalent to 53 mm on a full frame camera. The main lens was my Canon 35 mm. Some of the photos were exposed with an 35 mm Meyer Optik SLR lens (I don't know what mount it originally has) I've modded to LTM. One or two exposures were made using my Canon FL 50 mm lens on a FL/FD to LTM adapter. The 50 mm full frame lens makes for the equivalent of a tele-lens of 75 mm on the Chaika. (I may have made an exposure or two using my 20 mm Cosina for Nikon on a N to LTM adapter.)

Below are some of the exposures. Most are straight from the scanner which makes them a bit on the dark side. I do like that look - especially combined with the Chaika's framing and the loss of light in the corners. The photographs marked with an X have been slightly edited for brightness.

X

X

When I cut the film it turned out to very prone to curl. It isn't as stiff as the Agfa Variopan XL but is still a bother. I had to cut the strips in half lengths to be able to push them into the negative pockets.
X


X

Before I received the Metropolis rolls I did some research, and came to the conclusion that I wanted to expose it at 400 ASA. The film is rated to be exposed at 100-400 ASA. Depending on what you want to achieve with colours or contrast you can expose as you wish. What I saw in my research was that exposed to a lot of light (100 ASA) the colours came out being a bit on the pale side. I wanted more punch to the colours so opted for less light at 400 ASA.



I have to say that I am rather satisfied with what came out of the roll. Given the circumstances I had only mundane, badly lit subjects to photograph. The film doesn't enhance any "Kodak moments" of my life, but works well in compositions that I easily could have made in black and white instead.

Actually the idea of a high contrast colour film that almost could pass as a b&w in some conditions was what got me interested in the LomoChrome Metropolis in the first place. I like the idea of a black and white film that gives the impression of having had slight bits of colour added.

Experiencing these results my feeling is that this film is my new favourite colour film. However it is too expensive for me so I will only be able to use it a few times a year.



For most exposures I used my external rangefinder placed in the flash-shoe/coldshoe.







Canon FL 50 mm

Canon FL 50 mm

Thanks for reading this far! Don't hesitate to comment or check out my Instagram at #ourbooksmalmo. Visit my Etsy shop getOurBooks where you can find vintage cameras and photography equipment. If you feel inclined to contribute to this blog with material in the same vein, don't hesitate to contact me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lomo-Modd-Orama

A Lomo Smena 8 camera with a faulty shutter. An Olympus Pen F camera. Part of a microscope adapter for the Pen. That's what I started out with. 45 minutes later I had a new lens!

Mount
The mount came off a microscope adapter. I got the adapter from my first (of two) attempts to buy an Olympus Pen F. There seem to be some unscrupolous ebay sellers around peddling useless Pens with microscope adapted prisms. Luckily - in hindsight - I got a microscope adapter with this first Pen. Which I now trashed when a Lomo Smena 8 without a future landed on my doorstep (figuratively speaking).



Conversion / Havoc

Smena
I only knew the camera as a half-frame camera [Correction - it's a full frame camera!] called Smena 8 and hadn't thought to place it in Lomography-land until I read the name Lomo on the lens when it was already modded. Unwittingly I had tread the tiles of lomo-dom twice in as many weeks, also having put two rolls through a Praktica CX-1 which appears to be Ground Zero of Lo…

Chaika Leica

Well, here's a Chaika 2M that I bought from Alex Helios via Instagram. 

It's a great full manual viewfinder half-frame camera. The wheel on the top is for shutter time selection, from B to 1/30th to 1/250th of a second. The square button on the front right of the camera is the release/exposure.

The lens mounted on the camera in the picture is not the original Industar-69. The Chaika is a rare model compact camera since the prime lens is detachable. What is more is that it has M39 screw mount. But - like with the Paxette M39 system - you can't get focus with a lens from another M39 system.

Unless you adapt the lens or - in this case - the camera (mount)!





The Chaika mount is easily detached from the body by loosening four screws. If I want to mount the Leica thread mount M39 (LTM) lenses on the Chaika - which is my goal with this mod - I have to add 1.3mm to the mount. That is what is needed to change the camera's flange focal distance (FFD) from Chaika system to LTM sys…

Pax Expansivos - Expanding the Use of a Paxette Kit

That which you see before your eyes are hybrids. They are the concoction of a twisted mind. (Mine.)
The idea sprung to mind while researching the Paxette camera. I learned that it had exchangeable lenses with M39 screw mount - not compatible with Leica thread mount (LTM) system M39 lenses, though. The reason they weren't compatible systems? FFD difference. I.e. Flange Focal Distances differed.


The Paxette body project
But! I have another lens with M39 mount that's not compatible with LTM cameras, I pondered. The Mir-1 which came with the early Zenit SLRs. I had to use an adapter ring to make it fit my M42 screw mount cameras. What if...

So I fit it to the Paxette body. The exact same screw threads. Then I read up on FFD. The difference between the Paxette system and the M42 SLR system is 1.46mm apparently. That explains why I hadn't come across anyone online who claimed to use Paxette lenses on an SLR. It would be out of focus.

On the other hand... Why don't I just a…