Skip to main content

Colour me Bland - How I Use Colour in Photography: Redscale and Whatnot

I used to be a keen colour photographer. It was in the pre- and early digital age when developing (and copies!) was unexpensive. For many years I frequented the chosen labs on a weekly basis, handing in my single-use cameras, while being told to pick up the photos in a day or two.

Things changed. There came a day when I made a calculation. I would ditch colour film altogether, and instead get me a digital camera for the family photos. My private photography was too expensive for film.

Jump ahead five years: Nowadays I am very choosy when exposing colour film. It would have to be for a specific purpose like a vacation or a very urgent experiment. For economical - and artistic - reasons I am now a b&w photographer. Here I will talk about my colour photography.

Using colour

Kodak Ultramax 400 as redscale

I am a black & white photographer. That is a fact that hits me those few times that I make exposures on colour film, or in my digital camera (which is set to colour mode).

Photographing in b&w forces you to look for patterns and details that are kind of universal. You need to assemble a certain amount of pieces/feelings/inklings in a single frame to compose a photograph worthy of people's time.

When this approach is added to colour I realize how much training my eye has gotten from all the composing of b&w photos. It is very easy (though I'm not saying I am successful) to find the colour element that adds to the compositions. The massive amount of thinking/seeing in b&w teaches me to expose colour photographs.

Kodak Gold 200

Kodak Gold 200

Ralph Gibson (and others) said: Colour needs a friend. By that he meant that a strong colour element needs another colour to complement/compete with. I'm thinking that in b&w details/elements/lines/spaces/etc needs a friend to make an interesting photograph. For instance:

Please pardon the dust (and everything else). Here no colour is needed to empathise the 'message.'

My use of colour film 

Lomochrome Metropolis @ 100 ASA

I want the colours to be 'wrong.' Yes, that's it. I'd rather not have colours at all than have 'normal' colours when I expose colour film. That's why I prefer to redscale my films. Or for that matter, process slide film as if it was negative film made for prints - cross-processing.

Kodak Ultramax 400 as redscale

Fuji Provia 100 ASA slide film cross-processed

When using redscale or cross-processed film your colours go bonkers. Maybe not off-the-charts crazy but they become 'too much'. Of course you can correct them in post-processing but I won't. My photos aren't supposed to look exactly like the real world. They depict a possible reality which may be now or sometime in the past, in this land or in another.

Kodak 400 ASA expired

Using expired film

Kodak Ektachrome 64 - expired slide film developed as b&w in caffenol

I realized that I love expired slide film. I can either use it as a colour film or a b&w film.

There are some misunderstandings regarding expired film. Unlike with conventional colour film (as developed in C-41 chemistry) when I expose slide film I don't have to/want to add more light (the disputed rule of thumb, for expired films in general, is to add 1 step per decade since expiry date) to "help" the colours because of the chemical degradation that takes place in the film. Exposing slide film to more light than intended only burns out the highlights and brings out the grain, even if the film is expired (perhaps even more so).

1-2 stops overexposed Ektachrome 64 slide film processed in C-41

(Adding extra light to expired black & white film also has a negative impact, burning out the lighter areas and increasing graininess. The discontinued colour slide film Ektachrome 64 actually has a layer of silver just like a b&w film. (Perhaps that's why it turns out so nice in b&w when developed in caffenol.))

Expired colour negative film often gets slightly off colours. So I don't mind using them. It actually doesn't have to be expired to have colours go slightly off - if you don't calibrate your scanner the colours will be off (as in image 2 and 3 in this post) anyway. I usually don't strive to 'correct' colours for a realistic rendering. 

Fuji Nexia 200 ASA - expired

Making redscale film

Turn it around.

That's it. (Check it out on Youtube for tutorials.) Plus you want to expose it to more light than box speed. For a film with a box speed of 400 ASA I will expose it at 50 or 25 ASA. That is: I give it 300 to 400 % more light than when I expose it the right way around. That is because I want to get rid of the strong red tint. When redscaled the film will expose its colours in the wrong sequence, which makes the reds go really strong. So I like to 'burn' away the reds with more light. That's why my redscale photos often have a yellow or green tint instead of a yellow tint.

Kodak Ultramax 400 as redscale

But with redscale - as I wrote before - the scanner can tip the scale in either direction, too.

Kodak Ultramax 400 as redscale

Cinestill 800 ASA as redscale

The photos below are exposed with my Olympus Pen F and Helios 44 lens, on redscaled Ultramax 400.











That's about it about colour. Thanks for tagging along!


Visit my Etsy shop for cameras and related stuff, the facebook group on modding lenses and cameras or my Instagram account ourbooksmalmo.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Building a Large Format Camera - 9x12 Camera From Sourcing to First Photos

This is a sequence of pictures showing the process of my construction of a bellows camera for 9x12 cm photographs. The final exposures were made on paper positive paper.             Visit my  Etsy shop  for cameras and related stuff,  the  facebook group  on modding lenses and cameras or my Instagram account  ourbooksmalmo .

Chaika Leica

Well, here's a Chaika 2M that I bought from Alex Helios via Instagram.  It's a great full manual viewfinder half-frame camera. The wheel on the top is for shutter time selection, from B to 1/30th to 1/250th of a second. The square button on the front right of the camera is the release/exposure. The lens mounted on the camera in the picture is not the original Industar-69. The Chaika is a rare model compact camera since the prime lens is detachable. What is more is that it has M39 screw mount. But - like with the Paxette M39 system - you can't get focus with a lens from another M39 system. Unless you adapt the lens or - in this case - the camera (mount)! The Chaika mount is easily detached from the body by loosening four screws. If I want to mount the Leica thread mount M39 (LTM) lenses on the Chaika - which is my goal with this mod - I have to add 1.3mm to the mount. That is what is needed to change the camera's flange focal distance (FFD) from Chaika system to L

Lomo-Modd-Orama

A Lomo Smena 8 camera with a faulty shutter. An Olympus Pen F camera. Part of a microscope adapter for the Pen. That's what I started out with. 45 minutes later I had a new lens! Mount The mount came off a microscope adapter. I got the adapter from my first (of two) attempts to buy an Olympus Pen F. There seem to be some unscrupolous ebay sellers around peddling useless Pens with microscope adapted prisms. Luckily - in hindsight - I got a microscope adapter with this first Pen. Which I now trashed when a Lomo Smena 8 without a future landed on my doorstep (figuratively speaking). Conversion / Havoc Smena I only knew the camera as a half-frame camera [Correction - it's a full frame camera!] called Smena 8 and hadn't thought to place it in Lomography-land until I read the name Lomo on the lens when it was already modded. Unwittingly I had tread the tiles of lomo-dom twice in as many weeks, also having put two rolls through a Praktica CX-1 which appears to be Gr